Strategic Planning

Strategic Planning is tough.

Strategic goals are not short term, nor are they what might be called ‘operational’ or ‘institutional’. Forgive me; I do not intend to go word crazy so early on a Monday. All the same, leadership, like any well-studied discipline, has nuanced words that have layers of meaning.

“Replace worn out whiteboards in the three worst classrooms” would not be strategic. On the other hand, “Develop an institution-wide commitment to outstanding educational facilities” might be strategic. The result might be quite similar, but there is a higher purpose to strategic thinking.

In strategic thinking, for example, you might lose a battle to win a war. I do hasten to reassure everyone I don’t intend to throw a battle anytime soon, I simply want to explain that strategic planning happens at the twenty to thirty thousand foot mark rather than the five thousand mark.

Of course, a strategic plan isn’t worth the paper it is written on if it does not eventually get institutionalised by the folks on the ground.

So, I stand by my opening thoughts: Strategic Planning is tough and involves layers of meaning.

Strategic planning is like an ogre maybe.

This is where the Strategic Planning Practices Resource TeamSuPPoRT – comes into play. Working with employees from all over campus along with our Administrative Council, we went through eighteen revisions of a set of guiding questions. Answering these questions help our campus understand, from strategic planning teams to curious onlookers, how to create, build, and implement a successful strategic plan.

As you read, watch, or work on our strategic plan, think about the answers to these questions. Of course, if you have questions about these questions, do not be shy about calling x2468 anytime.

 

Innovation:

  • Does this plan leverage existing capabilities innovatively and effectively?
  • Does this plan incorporate external research adjusted to our unique needs?

Rigor:

  • Is there clear evidence the plan is well-researched with a current literature search?
  • Is expected impact thoroughly defined with measurable standards?

Relevance:

  • Is there clear evidence this plan ties to VC goals and mission?
  • Is there a clear case these activities will improve relevant key performance indicators?

Resources:

  • Are the resources required (e.g. monies, employees, facilities) specified?
  • Is the estimated lifecycle of these activities specified?
  • Have key stakeholders been identified, informed, and brought into partnership?
Advertisements

professorwiley

Matt Wiley is a tenured, associate professor of mathematics with awards in both mathematics education and honour student engagement. He earned an assortment of degrees in computer science, business, and pure mathematics from the University of California and Texas A&M systems. He is the director of quality enhancement at Victoria College, assisting in the development and implementation of a comprehensive assessment program to enhance institutional performance outcomes. A programmer, a published author, a mathematician, and a transformational leader, Matt has always melded his passion for writing with his joy of logical problem solving and data science. From the boardroom to the classroom, he enjoys finding dynamic ways to partner with interdisciplinary and diverse teams to make complex ideas and projects understandable and solvable.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s